Delet masked points

http://www.originlab.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7831&SearchTerms=IsMask http://www.originlab.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=3453 1. !comments: [->< Select Worksheet : Extract Worksheet Data... To Delete: Select the column with Masked values (presumably your Y column) Click the => button to create an Alias (in this example : B) In the Condition text box, type B[i]!=0 Click Test -- select if true button (This causes only those rows with masked values to be selected.) Click the Close button Select Edit : Delete from the menu (NOT the Delete key) All rows with masked values are removed. To Copy: Select the column with Masked values (presumably your Y column) Click the => button to create an Alias (in this example : B) In the Condition text box, type B[i]==0 Select 'Extract to New Workbook' as Output Click OK New Workbook will contain only those rows without masked values. 2. // Get number of rows in current sheet irows = wks.maxrows; // Save name of current sheet in %a variable %a=%h; // Create a new sheet win -t; %z = %h; // Initialize counter inum = 1; // Loop over all rows of source sheet for(ii=1; ii<=irows; ii++) { // If cell in 1st col is masked... if( 1 != ismasked(ii, %(%a,1)) ) { for (jj=1; jj<=wks.nCols; jj++) { // Copy over to destiation %(%h,jj,inum) = %(%a,jj,ii); } // Update counter inum++; } } wks.export.cntrl = 2; save -wh %h %1; win -c %h;

Worksheets(ActiveCell.Worksheet.Name).Select

Sub solveV0()

Dim NRow As Long, i As Long
Dim beta1 As Double, beta2 As Double, beta As Double
Dim V As Double, H As Double, h0 As Double, V0 As Double
Dim f As Double, dfdV0 As Double

Worksheets(ActiveCell.Worksheet.Name).Select

NRow = Cells(2, 10)
beta1 = Cells(2, 3)
beta2 = Cells(2, 4)

beta = (beta1 + beta2) ^ (beta1 + beta2) / beta1 ^ beta1 / beta2 ^ beta2

For i = 1 To NRow
V = Cells(4 + i, 1)
V = Abs(V)
H = Cells(4 + i, 2)
H = Abs(H)
h0 = Cells(4 + i, 8)
V0 = Sqr(V ^ 2 + H ^ 2)
If (H = 0) Then
V0 = V
Else
f = H / (V0 * h0) - beta * (V / V0) ^ beta1 * (1 - V / V0) ^ beta2
Do While (Abs(f) >= 0.000001)
dfdV0 = -H / h0 / V0 ^ 2 + beta * beta1 * V ^ beta1 / V0 ^ (beta1 + 1) * (1 - V / V0) ^ beta2 - beta * beta2 * (V / V0) ^ beta1 * (1 - V / V0) ^ (beta2 - 1) * V / V0 ^ 2
V0 = V0 - f / dfdV0
f = H / (V0 * h0) - beta * (V / V0) ^ beta1 * (1 - V / V0) ^ beta2
Loop

End If
Cells(4 + i, 9) = V0
Next i

End Sub

你没有敏捷的机智可以令人称赞。就算是这样吧！但是有许多别的品质你却不能说：“那是我生来所没有的。”那么，表现一下完全在你能控制之下的那些品质，如 诚恳、尊严、耐苦、避免纵乐；不要怨命，要安贫知足，要慈爱、独立、节俭、严肃、谦逊。你看出没有？多少美德你现在大可以表现，无法诿诸先天缺陷或性格不 合，而你却不肯尽力而为？难道你是被迫而不能不怨天尤人，贪婪无厌、甘心奉承、糟蹋身体、胁肩谄笑、大言不惭、心神不定，只因你是天赋如此？天啊，不是 的！你早已就能摆脱掉这一切了，如果有错，错在认识不清、认识太慢。这一点你也应该凭着训练而加以纠正，不可忽略你的迟钝或自甘迟钝。

礼乐（道德标准）之必须

1.国之四维

国有四维，一维绝则倾，二维绝则危，三维绝则覆，四维绝则灭......何谓四维。一曰礼，二曰义，三曰廉，四曰耻，礼不愈节，义不自进，廉不蔽恶，耻不从枉。故不逾节则上位安，不自进则民无巧诈，不蔽恶则行自全，不从枉则邪事不生。 -- 《管子·牧民》

2.
人生而有欲，欲而不得，则不能无求；求而无度量分界，则不能不争。争则乱，乱则穷。先王恶其乱也，故制礼义以分之，以养人之欲，给人之求。使欲必不穷乎物，物必不屈于欲，两者相持而长，是礼之所起也。 -- 《荀子·礼论》

optical illusion 视觉假相

1. A 和 B 那个颜色更甚？

2. Stand 1.5m or more, you can see it clearly;
but when you are close...

There is this old saying:

Kissing is a mean of getting two people so close together that they can’t see anything wrong with each other – Rene Yasenek

3.


4. are the purple lines straight or bent?

5.

6. how many black dots in this figure?

吉普塞人古老读心术

今晚偶尔看到了个所谓吉普塞人古老读心术的东西 ，其实不过是一个数字游戏，我粗略想了一下，应该是这样的：

1。任意一个两位数设为(ab)=a*10+b, 减其数字和a+b,得9*a,所以你得的这个数必是9的倍数，也就是9,18,27，。。,81之一；

2。注意9,18,27，。。。，的符号 是不是一样的；

3。这个程序应该是FLASH，当你移动鼠标找这个差时，程序可知道你的位置，换句话那个差值，这样a 就可以容易的求得；

4。这样任猜一个b都有9分之1的概率是对的；

5。再利用某个规则产生重要的符号，这样猜b 的概率可以大增大。

呵呵，随后就是蒙了，加上一些吉普赛人!@#$%^&*()就可掩人耳目了。

常怀有“有病”的心情

上周偶感风寒，整整一周在感冒中度过。疾病带来的身体上的不适自是不言而喻，但对生活生命健康的感悟比平时要深刻很多。不能不说是上天对疾病的另一种恩赐和补偿。
1. 对健康充满向往，单单是健康的平淡已是令人期望的甜蜜；
2. 生命中有太多地让人激动的有意义的事情等着去完成；
3. 抛开了很多原本没有意义的事情和不必要的忧虑和恐惧。正如《沉思录》所说：我们说的话和做的事，大都是没有意义的。如果把这些都取消的话，我们就会有更多的空闲和更少的麻烦。同样，我们也要舍弃那些无用的思想，因为无用的思想会导致无聊的行动。

其实所谓健康时不妨常怀有这些“有病”的感悟。

Happy mother's day

Memo

1. abaqus make library=sourcecode directory=path

2. abaqus viewer noGUI=pythoncode.py

3. lib /out:combined.obj 1.obj 2.obj

why not equal area?

Love life

The life is neither so difficult that you become scared. Believe there is always a way and the tomorrow's sun will shine on those who smile.
The life is nor so easy that you can dawdle away your time. There is no gains and happiness without pains.

my appreciation in these days...

ABAQUS Python Code - Find the max/min displacement (envelope) of all nodes

从abaqus odb中找出所有节点的最大小位移（包线）的python代码，原创（转载请说明出处和作者）：

run: abaqus viewer noGUI=mycode.py
author: Yinghui Tian
from: http://yhtian.blogspot.com
import odbAccess
odb = session.openOdb('EB.odb')
Pipenode = odb.rootAssembly.instances['PART-1-1'].nodeSets['PIPENODE']
MaxU = range(101)
MinU = range(101)
MaxW = range(101)
MinW = range(101)
for i in range(101):
MaxU[i] = 0.0
MinU[i] = 0.0
MaxW[i] = -100.0
MinW[i] = 0.0
OutDispfile = open('DispEnvEB.txt','w+')
OutDispfile.write("Node ")
OutDispfile.write("MinU ")
OutDispfile.write("MaxU ")
OutDispfile.write("MinW ")
OutDispfile.write("MaxW\n")
i = 0
while (i<=2000):
print i
timeframe = odb.getFrame(i)
dispp = timeframe.fieldOutputs['U']
j = 0
for v in dispp.values:
print j
if (v.data[0] >= MaxU[j]):
MaxU[j] = v.data[0]
if (v.data[0] <= MinU[j]):
MinU[j] = v.data[0]
if (i >200):
if (v.data[2] >=MaxW[j]):
MaxW[j] = v.data[2]
if (v.data[2] <=MinW[j]):
MinW[j] = v.data[2]
j = j + 1
i = i + 1
for i in range(101):
OutDispfile.write(str(i+1))
OutDispfile.write(" ")
OutDispfile.write(str(MinU[i]))
OutDispfile.write(" ")
OutDispfile.write(str(MaxU[i]))
OutDispfile.write(" ")
OutDispfile.write(str(MinW[i]))
OutDispfile.write(" ")
OutDispfile.write(str(MaxW[i]))
OutDispfile.write("\n")
OutDispfile.close()

My favourite and frequently used softwares 我最喜欢和常用的软件

Here I list my favourite and frequently used softwares (orderless):
1. ABAQUS
honestly, no reason to like but must because its open interface and widely acceptability
2. Fortran95
similiar to C which I like very much and was used to
3. Visual Studio2005
good editing environment. ps. hiding, folding and batch commenting
4. Origin
easy and powerful plotting software. love
5. Editplus
small and fast
6. UltraEdit
coloring and folding the ABAQUS input file
7. Python
like C and powerful to postprocess the ABAQUS results
8. Winmerge
recently found, very good to compare the program coding because many version of code during programming. very good
9. Getdata
very easy and good to digitise graphs, pictures to data
10. Visio
maybe the few ones I like from MS
11. EndNote
good to manage references
12. Mathematica
ever used MATLAB, now converted to Mathematica because it's equation derivaiton ability and handwriting style

俺爹俺娘

http://koudai.360.cn/u/15739147/photo_148912615.html

让人感动的照片。
----------------------------------------
随着年龄的增长，一心想远走高飞的浪子情怀正慢慢的转变为对家乡的怀念，对父母的不屑也凝结为深深的尊重，感激甚至有些崇拜。现在想来，他们说的话更多的不是唠叨，而是对生命和生活最朴素最凝练的领悟。
转此贴以遥寄牵挂：祝二老身体健康，事少福多。

From http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/%7Ejw/paper.html

Writing and publishing a scientific paper

How to write a scientific paper? How to publish it? This list of notes contains tips drafting and writing a paper, on submitting it, and on dealing with referees and editors. I write this from the perspective of an author, but more importantly from the perspective of reviewer and editor: I regularly read scientific papers that could be greatly improved. The current document was suggested by a number of readers of an early set of advice: How to write a thesis.

To do before you even think of papers
Writing a paper
Which journal?
What goes in? and how to write the sections
Reviews and reviewers
Journals, delays and impact

---

To do before you even think of papers

What question are you asking and answering? Why? Who would be interested?

Do bring these questions to the forefront of your attention from time to time. It's possible to become involved in the investigation to such a point that you lose sight of the main questions. You ought to be capable of answering the first one to yourself. It's a good idea to imagine answering the second and third to a (potentially difficult) reviewer or editor.

The materials and methods section of an experimental paper will be based on your lab journal. It will possibly include diagrams based on your lab journal. So for these, as well as ethical reasons, keep your journal carefully. Record everything that seems relevant (and even things that don't, if it's not too hard). It’s a good idea, when designing an experiment or tinkering with a technique to ask yourself: “how will this look in the materials and methods section?” or "it seems reasonable to me, but will it convince a skeptical reviewer?".

Analyse. For all your work, look at everything carefully. From time to time, discuss your work with a specialist and non-specialist. Look for new angles, new questions or answers that your data might be telling you. Try to argue new cases. Especially, argue against your own hypothesis or interpretation (because somebody else may do so, and you should be prepared). Does the design of the investigation need improvement? And finally, what do the data really say? It may not be what you think!

Writing a paper

Starting with the blank paper or screen is often the hard part. Fortunately, you have a story to tell, or you soon will have. First, ask yourself “What is this about?”,“What is important?” (Not what is important to you – to other people!) The answer to that is the raw material for the beginning of your story, about which we’ll talk further later, under subheadings.

It’s a good idea to start to assemble your argument, in brief form, right from the beginning. Perhaps words and bullet points are enough, but often you will need graphs and diagrams. Consider using diagrams for arguments, especially complicated arguments. They will not usually appear in the final version, but they could be useful to you in assembling the points in your story.

Which journal

You need to find a readership who will be interested in what you have done (or should be!). Who are they? What journals would they read regularly?

A good guide is to look at the papers that you will cite – papers that are relevant to your work. In what journals did they appear? Editors may ask the same question about your paper. It is true that the editor might like to see citations to his/her own journal for other reasons, but s/he is also likely to ask the question sincerely: if you haven’t referred to any work from this journal, what makes you think its readers will be interested in your work?

Before you decide, you should ask whether the topic really is in the ambit of that journal. One question that the reviewers are likely to be asked is how well your paper fits. Finally, when you have chosen, have a look at the nomenclature, styles, protocols and format of the journal before you start writing. Be aware that sending it to the wrong journal may slow your publication by months.

The introduction

You should start with a brief section, perhaps a paragraph in which you narrow the reader’s attention from the discipline of the journal down to your story. Essentially, you should answer the questions: in the field of …., why is your question an important or interesting one?

Follow this with a brief discussion of the necessary background. You’re not (usually) writing a review and the readers of this journal, especially those who have chosen to read your paper, are not complete novices. It’s hard to say how long this should be: from one to several paragraphs.

Then finish with a paragraph or two on why it was interesting and important to do your study and, very briefly, why you chose to do it this way.

Materials and methods

This should be easy to write, especially if you lab journal is well documented. You need to explain what you did in such a way that a competent worker in the field could reproduce it, what apparatus and materials you used and, in nonobvious cases, where you obtained them. Calibration might go here, unless it is either trivial and standard (so omit) or novel and important, in which case it could be part of the result.

Results and discussion

Should the results and discussion be separate or a single section? The answer depends on your case. Using separate sections has the advantage that the reader can look through the results and try to understand them, without being biased by your explanation. It has the disadvantage, especially if there are many parts to each section, that one either has to repeat material, or else ask the reader to skip backwards and forwards between sections.

Often you can let graphs tell the story. Spend some time plotting your results – perhaps in several different ways. Sometimes extra analysis and a different plot will show you things that you missed before. Take some time and think hard. Further, a really well planned presentation in a figure may make the difference between a reader understanding it or not.

Once you have a good set of figures, assemble them and use them as evidence as you tell a story to a real or imagined interlocuter. Imagine someone who doesn’t understand and who won’t be easily convinced. When you’ve done this, you have the outline of your story.

Conclusions

Often the conclusions form a separate section, but they may be part of the discussion. Ultimately you should answer your own questions – at least in part. And you may of course raise further questions.

Abstract

As a reviewer and editor, I am weary of reading abstracts that are largely introduction. The introduction is for that. Although it appears at the beginning, you should write the abstract last. It is not an introduction. It is a résumé. Here you tell the reader – including all of the many readers who will read the abstract but not the paper, what you actually show in this paper.

Style

Research papers are written in a relatively formal style – more formal than this document. Remember that many researchers speak English as a second or third language: they will find it easier if you keep to short sentences and avoid rare words and informal or innovative constructions.

An excellent and widely used reference for English grammar and style is A Dictionary of Modern English Usage by H.W. Fowler. One plea from this editor: The active voice ("we measured the frequency by…") is simpler than the passive ("the frequency was measured by …"), and it makes clear what you did. It also leads to fewer awkward sentences.

References

How many? No simple answer: some general journals severely limit the number. A review paper may have hundreds. As many as you need, plus often some for politeness: yes, a reference to a recent review or textbook will give the reader the background, but references to the original discoverer not only honours him/her, but also shows that you’ve read the primary sources. This need not be exaggerated: there is no need to cite the Principia every time you use Newton's laws of motion.

I’ve mentioned above, when discussing ‘which journal?’ that your reference list will probably include references from the target journal.

And finally, be aware that editors may look at your reference list when searching for suitable reviewers: they are, after all, people doing relevant work in the field.

Figure captions

Try to keep the captions short, but still allow the information in the figure (though not necessarily the explanation) to be understood on its own. Take advantage of any elegant ways of putting information into legends on the figure, rather than in the caption.

Figures

Figures are often the most important part of a scientific paper, so please take some time making really good quality figures.

• Remember that nearly all journals print in monochrome.
• Look at the journal and see how wide its columns are: that width (or occasionally twice that width) are the preferred size of your figures.
• It may be be possible to make publication-quality figures using Excel, but I've not yet seen it done: that software was designed for accountants and administrators – a much bigger market than scientists.
• Figures with symbols differentiated by colour rather than shape, data without error bars, inefficient use of space (and especially figures made using Excel): they all shout “I am not a researcher”, which is probably not the image you wish to project.
• Schematic diagrams are usually more informative than photographs: they show how it works rather than what it looks like. However, in some cases a well made photograph is useful. Take the trouble to find a plain background and good lighting.

Title and key words

Think carefully about these: they will be used by indexing services and search engines. They could be important in attracting the relevant readers to your work.

Format

Read the journal’s Instructions to authors carefully. Then follow it closely, including its referencing style. Either that or annoy the editor – it’s your choice.

By the way, you may think that the editor is a person whose job it is to edit. This is almost never the case. Usually, the editor (like me) is someone whose job is to be a scientist and who has had the editing job added to his/her many other duties, with no time allowance or payment. Even sending the ms back to you, unread, with a covering note saying "Read the Instructions to authors" takes time.

Covering letter

Usually, your submitted manuscript will be accompanied by a covering letter. In this you explain why that journal is appropriate for this paper and why its readers would be interested. (A cynic would say that some editors may be influenced if you can imply that publishing your paper will attract a high number of citations, but I doubt that this is important.)

Reviews and reviewers

My second paper (and my first as a sole author) came back with a few dozen suggestions for changes. At the time, I was disappointed: it implied that my paper wasn’t perfect! Well, of course it wasn’t. Nowadays, I am disappointed when there are no suggested changes. (Nearly) every such suggestion is advice from an expert on how you can make your paper better and more understandable. Free, expert advice – be grateful.

If the comments are negative, cool off. If they didn't understand, it's usually your fault, to a large extent. Yes, they read it quickly, but they are experts in the field. If they didn't understand it in a quick read, it usually means that you've not explained it well. So think "How could s/he have thought that and why?" Put yourself in their position – they haven't been as close to this problem as you, and they (like most readers) are not as interested in it as you are.

Yes, it’s probably taken them a while to get back to you. But there is the advantage that now you can read your paper again, with a fresh view.

What if they bounce it?

Console yourself that good papers are sometimes rejected. Researchers often agree that a 'small step' paper that fits into the established ideas is easier to publish than is a completely new idea. However, you should read the reasons given for rejection and consider very seriously the possibility that the editor and reviewers either are right, or else have misunderstood your work.

Sometimes, you may be able to rewrite and to resubmit. This usually involves extensive rewriting: if they have misunderstood your paper, then the new version should be nearly impossible to misunderstand.

It is possible to try another journal, where you may or may not get the same reviewers. If you do this, again, make sure that the new version will be understood.

Most importantly, consider the possibility that the reviewers are correct.

It's accepted!

Read the proofs very carefully, especially any equations. By the time the proofs come, the paper will be out of your short term memory, so you can read it again with a fresh pair of eyes.

Regarding copyright: My advice is not to be too generous. As researchers, we create the content for journals, we review them, we edit them and very often we deliver them to the publisher in a form that requires very little effort to publish. Then the publishers, or at least a couple of large multinational ones, bankrupt our libraries by charging exorbitant subscription fees. So don’t be too generous. If there is a line asking you not to post your own paper on your own server, consider crossing it out before you sign, or how you can get around it. (One option might be posting a manuscript version of the final published paper).

Journals, delays and impact

The time to publication varies greatly both among journals and among papers in the same journal. Usually, a journal publishes the dates when a paper was received, when it was accepted, and when it appeared on line and/or in hard copy. (The last is not always simple: the nominal date of publication does not always coincide with the appearance in press.) So you can obtain an estimate of how long it will take – which is usually disappointing news to new authors. Surprisingly often, the delay includes a substantial component from the authors: the journal recommends changes and authors take a while to make these, or at least to make them to the satisfaction of the editor. The delay varies very considerably among journals, however, and this is one factor that you may consider to be important.

Different journals have different prestige, popularity, impact and impact factor. This last is defined in a number of different ways, including this one: the number of citations the articles in a journal receive in a given year divided by the number of articles published. Some people use impact factor to obtain a simple quantitative estimate of importance. Some journals, including some of those with high impact factors, are reputed to have a high rate of rejection of submitted papers. The editors may decide that, although a paper is technical correct, it is not important enough to be selected for the limited space that they have.

To take two extreme examples, Nature and Science are generalist science journals with very high impact factors, however calculated, and they enjoy considerable prestige. They are highly selective and have two filters. The first is the editors’ judgment of the broad interest and importance of a manuscript. A very large majority of (probably very good) papers are rejected at this stage as being insufficiently important and interesting to attract widespread interest from a very broad readership. Only after passing this filter is one’s manuscript sent for review. These journals have the advantage of great speed: you find out in a week or so whether your paper has gone to review and, if it has, you have the reviews within another couple of weeks. The time from submission to publication may be only several weeks, compared with several months or more for most journals.

郭德刚相声

虽然在天津生活了多年，而且从小就是相声迷，但一直不喜欢郭德刚的东西，总觉得很媚俗。当然也谈不上讨厌。

不过，今天看到的这个相声小段让我有所转变。其表演还是较幽默自如的：
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTOvEHodeVA&feature=player_embedded

无题

http://www.bullogger.com/blogs/sun0413/


网上随便看看关于本学科的论坛，不知点了那位大侠的签名档，进了上面的博客。
很惊讶作者的立场和笔锋，同时更惊叹国内民主的进步和上面的开明！言论自由程度一点也不次于国外，赞一下

心理陷阱

“我怎么会这样？”“我怎么老是破坏自己的好事呢？”“我为什么始终得不到我想要的呢？”

“我怎么会这样？”“我怎么老是破坏自己的好事呢？”“我为什么始终得不到我想要的呢？”这些痛苦的呼声来自各行各业自毁前程的人心中。在预防或克服自毁行为上，有一种障碍必须跨越，那就是你必须先能察觉内心推动你自取其败的驱力。仔细考虑一下，看自己有没有下面列出的足以使当事人沉溺在自毁的漩涡中无法自拔的12种最常见的心理陷阱。

1、求败的性格。有些人的性格天生就倾向于自取其败。他们一再地自陷于受欺压、被打击的绝境，而且一筹莫展，就是眼前摆明了有退路、出口，他们还是视而不见，拒绝利用。就算是能够胜任的工作，他们也一再地失败。

2、自恋狂。妄自尊大，过于自负，自视过高的人，通常会一头撞入自毁之门。自恋狂惯常需要别人不停地赞美、爱慕，该否定却肯定，为了让对方喜欢自己，常不分青红皂白地答应别人的所有要求。

3、情感幼稚。以幼稚的行为引起他人的注意，在工作场合扮小丑以引起他人的注意，如此很难得到他人的尊重，实在是一种打击自己事业的方式。

4、求败的认知。缺乏自信，划地为限，总认为自己会失败，内心有错误的预期心理，而自己造就出失败的意境，岂有不败之理？

5、虚幻的期望。志大才疏，对自己的才能和潜力不能作出明智的估测，对自己要求过高，生活目标极不现实。不切实际的妄想，只会自取灭亡。

6、自卑过重。自卑感严重的人在自尊心作祟下，有时会做出荒诞之举以证明自己的价值，结果反而自取其败。自卑的心理会使他们认为自己先天即不足，后天又失调，自然无法和别人竞争。

7、报复心强。报复心强者，易意气用事，心中常满是怨怒，一旦急火攻心，常只顾着发泄情绪而不听劝，无法泰然面对挫折，结果失去人缘，陷入麻烦中。

8、寻求注意。喜欢出风头，只有成为别人注目的焦点，才能抵挡袭来的寂寞、沮丧、焦虑等不佳情绪，但出风头的方式往往适得其反，不惜以给别人留下笑料，对别人皱眉头的反应也甘之如饴，喜欢高谈阔论，大吹大擂，私心企盼别人的称赞。

9、追求刺激。有些人爱走偏锋，只有在将生活的步调转得很快，晕头转向之后，才会快乐。但只顾追求刺激常使人罔顾了正确判断。这样的人最好能够学会控制自己找乐子的激情，将自毁的机会降至最低，使自己不必藉借刺激麻痹自己，也能快乐地生活。

10、欺世情结。有些人总认为自己的才能不像别人想像中那样好，总担心有一天会被揭穿真相，从而内咎深重，以致于以自寻毁灭来惩罚自己，比如做主管者可能会突然做出一个疯狂决定来证明自己根本没资格做主管。

11、执拗多疑。心胸狭隘，整日疑神疑鬼，总在揣测别人的动机，计较同事是否在背后算计你，势必会降低工作精力，影响你的人际关系，导致周围人的疏远、反感和冷落。这些偏执狂自导自演的行为，最终使预言成真。

12、中年危机。感到中年危机者，对工作事业都不满意，认为眼前没有任何挑战值得努力以赴，变得死气沉沉，喜怒无常，悲观消极，从而做出自毁之举。

----非原创

测试你的左右脑切换能力

耶鲁大学实验: 一张舞女图测试你的左右脑切换能力

如果你看见这个舞女是顺时针转，说明你用的是右脑； 

　　如果是逆时针转，说明你用的左脑。 

　　耶鲁大学耗时5年的研究成果。 

　　据说，14%的美国人可以两个方向都能看见. 

　　大脑就是你自己的智囊。科学研究证明，大脑分为左半球和右半球。左半球是管人的右边的一切活动的，一般左脑具有语言、概念、数字、分析、逻辑推理等功能；右半球是管人的左边的一切活动的，右脑具有音乐、绘画、空间几何、想像、综合等功能。 

　　 

　　人的左右半脑是不平衡发展的，统计显示，绝大多数人是左脑发达（其中大约一半的人比较均衡一些）。全球有10％的人是左撇子，即右脑比较发达。而左右脑的发育程度不同，隐含了你的很多特质和天赋的秘密： 

　　理解数学和语言的脑细胞集中在左半球；发挥情感、欣赏艺术的脑细胞集中在右半球。 

　　 

　　右半脑发达的人在知觉和想像力方面有可能更强一些；而且知觉、空间感和把握全局的能力都有可能更强一些。在各种动作上相对更敏捷一些。 

　　右脑最重要的贡献是创造性思维。右脑不拘泥于局部的分析，而是统观全局，以大胆猜测跳跃式地前进，达到直觉的结论。在有些人身上，直觉思维甚至变成一种先知能力，使他们能预知未来的变化，事先做出重大决策。 

　　 

　　左脑的记忆回路是低速记忆，而右脑的是高速记忆，左脑记忆是一种“劣根记忆”，右脑记忆则让人惊叹，它有“过目不忘”的本事。 

　　处理简单的语言问题时人们左脑相对活跃；左脑发达的人处理事情比较有逻辑、条理。 

　　左脑发达在社交场合比较活跃，善于判断各种关系和因果。 

　　左脑发达善于统计，方向感强。 

　　左脑发达善于组织。 

　　左脑发达善于做技术类、抽象的工作（如电脑编程）。 

　　 

　　男性是根据右脑和左脑各自不同的分工来使用大脑的；相比之下，女性却可以同时使用左脑和右脑。 

　　男性和女性大脑的最大区别主要是大脑皮层的构造不同。女性大脑的沟通交流能力特别发达，她们细致、敏感，能够通过察言观色来了解对方的心理，直觉也很灵敏。从构造上看，女性左右脑的脑梁部分粗于男性，因此左右脑可以顺利地同时使用。 

　　 

　　多数男性方向感天生就比女性强。 

　　男性的语言表达能力和理解能力远逊于女性。 

　　 

　　慢慢欣赏，如果旁边有人，可以一起来看，看2人的答案是不是一样的。

立足现在

锻炼自己即刻行动的能力。充分利用对现时的认知力。不要沉浸在过去，也不要耽溺于未来，要着眼于今天。当然要有梦想、筹划和制订创造目标的时间。不过，这一切就绪后，一定要学会脚踏实地、注重眼前的行动。要把整个生命凝聚在此时此刻。

一组数据，未经核实

用于行政费用占生产总值:
中国:25.6%
印度:6.3%
美国:3.4%
日本:2.8%
用于教育,医疗的比列:
中国:3.8%
印度:19.7%
美国:21.5%
日本:23.3%

fishing knot

这个圣诞假期迷了钓鱼，从最开始连钩也不会绑的渔盲到后来小有渔获，得到了很多乐趣。

可我这个人呀，干什么都会有瘾(除了干活~~)，曾经玩游戏、上网、编程、看小说、甚至刻印章...

玩物丧志呀，咱不能为了娱乐耽误工作和生活吧。所以渔杆渔具都收起来了，与钓鱼有关的东西该扔的也扔了(有点象以前删游戏再装再删..这次不再装了，起码今年到圣诞节不再去了)。

下面把收集的绑钩法汇总一下，以作纪念吧。